Archives du mot-clé SU-27

The Latest Russian Fighter Jet Blows America’s Away

Outgunned by the Su-30 family of aircraft and suffering critical design flaws, the American F-35 is staring down the barrel of obsolescence – and punching a gaping hole in western air defences.

22.jpg

This article is an excellent read to understand how Russia’s technological level is best in its class in many military sectors, especially with regard to fighter jets.  It originally appeared in Russia & India Report. The SU-30 continues to be the number one choice among global buyers.

Built to be the deadliest hunter killer aircraft of all time, the F-35 has quite literally become the hunted. In every scenario that the F-35 has been wargamed against Su-30 Flankers, the Russian aircraft have emerged winners. America’s newest stealth aircraft – costing $191 million per unit – is riddled with such critical design flaws that it’s likely to get blown away in a shootout with the super-maneuverable Sukhois.

Stubby wings (that reduce lift and maneuverability), a bulbous fuselage (that makes it less aerodynamic) low speed and a super hot engine (which a half decent radar can identify) are just a few of the major flaws that will expose its vulnerability during air combat.

With more than 600 Flankers (Sukhoi-27s and its later iterations such as the Su-30, Su-34 and Su-35 Super Flanker) flying with air forces around the world, the fate of the fifth generation F-35 seems decidedly uncertain. Aerospace experts across the world are veering around to the view that America’s most expensive fighter development program (pegged at $1.5 trillion) will be a sitting duck for the flankers.

“It’s a turkey,” declares aerospace engineer Pierre Sprey in an interview to Dutch television. Few people are as qualified to speak about fighter aircraft as Sprey. He is the co-designer of the F-16 Falcon jet and the A-10 Warthog tank buster, two of the most successful aircraft in the US Air Force (USAF).Winslow T. Wheeler, Director of the US’ Straus Military Reform Project, Centre for Defense information, agrees. “The F-35 is too heavy and sluggish to be successful as a fighter,” he says. “If we ever face an enemy with a serious air force we will be in deep trouble.”

23

So far the US has been lucky it has never really encountered a “serious” military. Over the skies of war-weary Iraq, tiny Libya and utterly defenseless Afghanistan, the American aircraft operated with impunity. But luck can run out – if they ever come up against the air forces of Russia, China or India the outcome won’t be so one-sided. In particular, the Indian Air Force has beaten the USAF’s fourth generation fighters using both third and fourth generation jets.

The biggest problem with the F-35 is that its US designers are betting on stealth and long range radar to compensate for its lack of speed and maneuverability. But stealth is not really all that it is cracked up to be; it is not the cloak of invisibility.

Plus, Russia’s already excellent radars are getting better. Says Defense Industry Daily (DID): “Meanwhile, key radar advances are already deployed in the most advanced Russian surface-to-air missile systems, and existing IRST (infra-red scan and track) systems deployed on advanced Russian and European fighters are extending enemy detection ranges against radar-stealthy aircraft. Fighter radar pick-up capability of up to (46km) by 2020 is proposed against even ultra-stealthy aircraft like the F-22, coupled with IRST ability to identify Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile firings and less infrared-stealthy aircraft at (92km) or more.”

24

At the same time, there is no such thing as one radar in a war. “There are lots of radars,” Sprey explains. “And you can’t be nose-on or dead-level to every radar in the theater. There are always going to be radars that are going to be shining up (from below) or looking from above – they can all see you.”

Short on firepower

Another issue is with the American aircraft’s overall shape. “Most great airplanes are beautiful because you are trying to reduce drag,” Sprey says. “But here because of stealth they had to make it very bulbous, very big as they had to carry the weapons inside because as soon as you carry the weapons outside they reflect radar. So this is a huge penalty to the performance of the aircraft which is now big and lumbering like a bomber.”

Lower internal payload means the designers at Lockheed-Martin have signed the F-35’s death warrant. The aircraft carries just two large bombs and four small ones, and a maximum of four beyond visual range (BVR) air-to-air missiles (AAMs).

The USAF claims the F-35’s advanced radar will see the enemy aircraft first and be able to take it out with one of its four long-range AAMs. But BVR kills are still the stuff of dreams for fighter pilots and are quite rare.

25.jpg

In fact, the reliance on the radar acquisition and AAMS can prove suicidal – as indeed it was once upon a time. During the Vietnam War the USAF was so smitten with the concept of BVR combat that the first F-4 fighters were armed only with missiles. But after the Vietnamese Air Force pilots shot them down by the bucket load, the Americans reintroduced cannons in the F-4.

In fact, Russia, which has the most advanced and varied range of BVR missiles in the world, arms its Flankers with at least eight missiles for the simple reason that it takes several shots at a fast moving target to score a kill.

That the Americans ignored this basic lesson of air combat is mind boggling.

In theory, American pilots would play ‘video games’ and take out enemy aircraft at 1000 km. In practice, air combat is like a knife fight. According to DID, the F-35 is very likely to wind up facing many more “up close and personal” opponents than its proponents suggest, while dealing with effective BVR infrared-guided missiles as an added complication. Unlike the F-22, the F-35 is described as “double inferior” to modern Su-30 family fighters within visual range combat.”

The much larger and varied inventory of missiles combined with super-maneuverability, therefore, bestows the Flankers with an edge that’s unparalleled in modern air combat.

Fleet availability

According to the new philosophy of air combat that is being defined by USAF-Lockheed-Martin careerists, the one-size-fits-all F-35 will replace all other fighters as well as ground support aircraft.

But here’s the rub. Because the F-35 is such an expensive aircraft, air forces will buy fewer units. For instance, Japan currently has 100 F-15s but it will replace them with just 70 F-35s. Again, because the F-35 will also be expensive to fly and maintain, air forces will limit pilot flying hours. (Already, spending cuts have forced the USAF to eliminate more than 44,000 flying hours and ground 17 combat air squadrons).

Besides, ‘stealth’ comes with a price. On the F-35 most of the maintenance is on the stealth coating. “It is a ludicrous impediment to combat,” Sprey says. “You are sitting on the ground for 50 hours fiddling on the aircraft trying to make it stealthy when it’s not stealthy anyhow.”

Plus, 100 per cent fleet availability is a logistical impossibility. The USAF averages around 75 per cent – which is pretty decent – but when it comes to stealth aircraft the figures nosedive. The USAF’s super-secret B2A stealth bomberhas an availability rate of just 46.7 per cent. And America’s most expensive fighter, the F-22, despite its $350 million price tag has a fleet availability rate of only 69 per cent.

So if you are, say, the Australian air force, just 48 of your planned fleet of 70 F-35s will be battle ready at any given time. Your chances against the Chinese who have 400 Flankers are smaller than small. You can bet the Aussies won’t be joining the knife fight unless escorted by big brother USA.

Wheeler, who has dealt with US national security issues for over three decades, lays out the implications for western air forces planning to induct the F-35: “The pilots will get worse as they’ll get much less training, which is most important than any technical issue. There’ll be far fewer pilots as the whole force will have to shrink, and you will basically have a showpiece aircraft that can’t do anything. It’s useless, it’s truly monumentally useless, it will ruin any air force that uses it.”

The dogfight hasn’t yet started and the Flankers are up 1-0.

Federico Pieraccini

Russia Insider

Direct link here: http://russia-insider.com/en/military/2014/10/20/01-11-39pm/why_f-35_sitting_duck_flankers

 

 

 

Syrie: des Sukhoi SU-30 russes cachés derrière des avions-cargo IL-76 accueillis par des Mig-29 syriens

Des informations rapportés par des médias israéliens font état de l’arrivé d’avions de combat russes de type Sukhoi SU-30 ( code Otan: Flanker C), SU-27 (Flanker), SU-25 (Frogfoot) et SU-24 (Fencer) en formation derrière le sillage d’avions cargo lourds  Ilyouchine Il-76 en Syrie.

Selon des médias US, les avions de combat que la Russie compte livrer aux forces aériennes syriennes, étaient cachés sous la signature Radar des avions cargo russes du pont aérien que Moscou semble en train de renforcer avec les bases aériennes syriennes dans la province de Lattaquié.

De source syrienne, on a appris que des Mikoyan Mig-31 (Foxhound) russes, accompagnés de deux Mikoyan-Gurevitch Mig-25 (Foxbat) syriens, ont entamé des vols de reconnaissance à un rythme quotidien au dessus de l’ensemble du territoire syrien, y compris celui capturé par l’organisation terroriste Daech. Cette dernière est également la cible de frappes aériennes occidentales et arabes dont l’efficacité est contestée par Damas.

Ce qui semble certain est qu’à un certain moment, plus précisément lors de l’arrivée des premières formations aériennes russes en Syrie, l’ensemble des Mig-29 (Fulcrum) des forces aériennes syriennes a pris l’air pour se joindre aux SU-30 MK livrés par Moscou.

En plein conflit, l’armée de l’air syrienne vient ainsi de recevoir des Mig-31 et des Su-30 ainsi que des drones (dont certains à l’état de prototype) de la part de Moscou.

La réponse du berger à la bergère…

Cette semaine a vu la Chine et la Russie conduire un exercice naval grandeur nature en mer de Chine de l’Est. Cet entrainement était basé sur la lutte anti-pirates, mais il comprenait aussi des exercices d’identifications aériennes, de défenses aériennes et d’assauts navals. Pour avoir une idée des forces en présence, je vous recommande d’aller voir les photos ici.

Dans le même temps, les Forces d’Auto-Défense (l’armée japonaise) avaient décidé de conduire des exercices de renseignement et de surveillance dans le même secteur. Pour cela, quoi de mieux que d’utiliser des avions, et plus particulièrement des P-3 Orion. Cependant, ce qui devait arriver arriva, et à trop vouloir espionner les japonais ont bien failli se brûler les ailes.

Les pilotes de l’avion de reconnaissance ont eu la surprise – sinon la frayeur – de voir apparaître, à moins de cinquante mètres d’eux, un SU-27 aux couleurs de l’armée chinoise (PLA). Une heure plus tard, un autre chasseur (le même?) est venu à moins de trente mètres du P-3 Orion.

Bien entendu, les deux pays se condamnent mutuellement. Pour Tokyo, les chinois n’ont pas le droit d’escorter un de leur avion, surtout s’il est armé de missiles; quant à Pékin, ils accusent le Japon d’espionnage, et leur demandent de les laisser faire leurs exercices navals en paix.

Je vous concède que cette info n’est pas primordiale. Mais elle est symptomatique de la lutte entre l’Occident et l’alliance Russo-chinoise.
Autre exemple de cette lutte, la seizième escadre de la flotte navale chinoise vient de faire escale…au Nigeria, pour une visite de quatre jours. Cette flotte comprend environ 660 hommes répartis sur des frégates lance-missiles Luoyang, des frégates de guidage (de missiles) Yancheng à peine sortie du chantier naval, et un navire de ravitaillement.

Le commandant de la flotte – le premier capitaine Li Pengcheng – a déclaré que la visite permettrait d’améliorer les relations entre les deux marines ainsi qu’entre les deux pays. Il a ajouté que la flotte effectuait un voyage de paix, d’amitié et de coopération, avec la promesse solennelle de la Chine de sauvegarder la paix mondiale et la promotion de l’amitié avec le Nigeria.

Lors de la visite, la flotte chinoise devrait procéder à une série de programmes, y compris une réunion avec les officiers nigérians de haut niveau, et réaliser des échanges professionnels ainsi qu’un exercice conjoint.

Bref, si les USA, la Grande-Bretagne et la France sont maintenant présent au Nigeria, Pékin – avec cette escale – avance ses pions et prouve à certains pays d’Afrique qu’ils peuvent aussi être présent militairement…